Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
Re: mud grammar
On 20/03/97 at 02:08 AM, "Jon A. Lambert" <jlsysinc#ix,netcom.com>
said:
>I disliked how iterators are used in STL. They seem rather clumsy to
>me.
I really like OpenClass' cursor model here. It's very simple and
clean with clear cut semantics of when a cursor is valid or not.
Iterators I can get along with, especially once I customise them, but
I'll agree their not the most natural of beasts.
--
J C Lawrence Internet: claw#null,net
----------(*) Internet: coder#ibm,net
...Honourary Member of Clan McFud -- Teamer's Avenging Monolith...
- Thread context:
- Re: mud grammar, (continued)
- Re: mud grammar,
claw claw#null,net, Tue 18 Mar 1997, 01:26 GMT
- Re: mud grammar,
Nathan Yospe yospe#hawaii,edu, Tue 18 Mar 1997, 12:53 GMT
- Re: mud grammar,
claw claw#null,net, Thu 20 Mar 1997, 00:16 GMT
- Re: mud grammar,
Jon A. Lambert jlsysinc#ix,netcom.com, Thu 20 Mar 1997, 15:01 GMT
- Re: mud grammar,
claw claw#null,net, Fri 21 Mar 1997, 22:32 GMT
- Re: mud grammar,
Nathan Yospe yospe#hawaii,edu, Sat 22 Mar 1997, 07:38 GMT
- Re: mud grammar,
coder coder#ibm,net, Mon 24 Mar 1997, 04:29 GMT
- Re: mud grammar,
Nathan Yospe yospe#hawaii,edu, Mon 24 Mar 1997, 05:25 GMT
- Re: mud grammar,
Chris Gray cg#ami-cg,GraySage.Edmonton.AB.CA, Mon 24 Mar 1997, 15:00 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]