Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
Re: Event-driven?
> From: coder#ibm,net
>
> Event based systems are old, as old at least as message based/passing
> systems. Them old fogey host guys (Hi Jon! <kof>) were doing message
> passing systems back when S/390 and S/360 where the freshest and newest
> things since sliced bread, and long before anyone even thought about
> objects.
You realize of course we had no understanding of what we were doing at
the time. We tried our best to subvert and get around this akward message
passing all in the name of more MIPS. We now realize our actions were
evil. I often experience phone trouble immediately after hearing the phrase
"maintaining a legacy mainframe application". :-P
- Thread context:
- Re: Event-driven?, (continued)
- Re: Event-driven?,
Shawn Halpenny rsh#dos,nortel.com, Fri 04 Apr 1997, 23:05 GMT
- Re: Event-driven?,
Chris Gray cg#ami-cg,GraySage.Edmonton.AB.CA, Sun 06 Apr 1997, 02:14 GMT
- Re: Event-driven?,
coder coder#ibm,net, Mon 07 Apr 1997, 01:05 GMT
- Re: Event-driven?,
coder coder#ibm,net, Mon 07 Apr 1997, 08:34 GMT
- Re: Event-driven?,
Jon A. Lambert jlsysinc#ix,netcom.com, Mon 07 Apr 1997, 10:53 GMT
- Introduction,
Shawn Halpenny malachai#iname,com, Fri 04 Apr 1997, 01:37 GMT
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- Re: Introduction,
Nathan Yospe yospe#hawaii,edu, Fri 04 Apr 1997, 12:45 GMT
- Re-Introduction,
S001GMU S001GMU#nova,wright.edu, Fri 04 Apr 1997, 21:49 GMT
- Re: Introduction,
Chris Gray cg#ami-cg,GraySage.Edmonton.AB.CA, Sun 06 Apr 1997, 02:47 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]