Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
Re: Threads and Sockets (Was Ho hum)
In <199704151453.OAA232672#out1,ibm.net>, on 04/15/97
at 09:31 AM, S001GMU#nova,wright.edu said:
>At the very least during developement, when crashing is normal and
>acceptable and often desired behavior, it's nice to have the logfile
>I/O handled by a seperate process that isn't taken down with the
>crash and can keep logging the info.
SyslogD?
--
J C Lawrence Internet: claw#null,net
(Contractor) Internet: coder#ibm,net
---------------(*) Internet: clawrenc#cup,hp.com
...Honorary Member Clan McFUD -- Teamer's Avenging Monolith...
- Thread context:
- Re: Issues from the digests and Wout's list, (continued)
- Threads and Sockets (Was Ho hum),
S001GMU S001GMU#nova,wright.edu, Tue 15 Apr 1997, 03:55 GMT
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- Re: Threads and Sockets (Was Ho hum),
Jeff Kesselman jeffk#tenetwork,com, Tue 15 Apr 1997, 10:09 GMT
- Re: Threads and Sockets (Was Ho hum),
S001GMU S001GMU#nova,wright.edu, Tue 15 Apr 1997, 20:33 GMT
- Re: Threads and Sockets (Was Ho hum),
clawrenc clawrenc#cup,hp.com, Tue 15 Apr 1997, 23:07 GMT
- Re: Threads and Sockets (Was Ho hum),
Chris Gray cg#ami-cg,GraySage.Edmonton.AB.CA, Mon 21 Apr 1997, 04:09 GMT
- Strings & Memory Usage,
Greg Munt greg#uni-corn,demon.co.uk, Tue 15 Apr 1997, 03:13 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]