Re: r.g.m.* - worthwhile thread

[Jeff Kesselman <jeffk#tenetwork,com>]

If thsi is inter0MUD conenctions, yeah I agree with brandon too.

Satndard and quite useable protocls already exist.  Rule #1 of internet
programming "follow the RFC"..

JK


At 11:51 AM 4/17/97 -0700, you wrote:
>In <199704170250.CAA262759#out1,ibm.net>, on 04/16/97 
>   at 11:33 AM, Nathan Yospe <yospe#hawaii,edu> said:
>
>>Hey, guys. Just a little notice, as none of you seem to be
>>participating in this one. (CG, this looks like right up your alley)
>>Check the A Mud Protocol (was: RE: ideas for betterment...) thread on
>>rec.games.mud.admin... it has gotten out of the usual rut and is
>>starting to look pretty interesting.
>
>You seen the posting by Bandon on ColdX's CML (which I crossed to this
>list) by now.  That pretty well wrapped up the deal for me.
>
>-- 
>J C Lawrence                           Internet: claw#null,net
>(Contractor)                           Internet: coder#ibm,net
>---------------(*)               Internet: clawrenc#cup,hp.com
>..Honorary Member Clan McFUD -- Teamer's Avenging Monolith...
>
>