Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
OT: Attributions
I think we probably all agree that they're useful things to have when
replying and given the flak one receives if they're not present, perhaps
our list owner would consider working a line into the standard
invitation that mentions our, erm, zeal for attributions when
participating in list discussions? True, it's not a particularly useful
line, but seeing it written down might prompt those potentially few new
members to double-check into how (and if) their mail agent does them.
Just a thought.
--
Shawn Halpenny
"You can't buy the necessities of life with cookies"
- "Edward Scissorhands"
- Thread context:
- Re: [MUD-Dev] OT: Attributions,
Chris Gray cg#ami-cg,GraySage.Edmonton.AB.CA, Thu 04 Sep 1997, 09:41 GMT
- Re: [MUD-Dev] Modeling spells/skills as collections of affects,
Chris Gray cg#ami-cg,GraySage.Edmonton.AB.CA, Thu 04 Sep 1997, 09:41 GMT
- Re: combat and hit points,
clawrenc clawrenc#cup,hp.com, Tue 02 Sep 1997, 22:05 GMT
- GURPS v Hero v RuneQuest,
clawrenc clawrenc#cup,hp.com, Tue 02 Sep 1997, 21:46 GMT
- OT: Attributions,
Shawn Halpenny malachai#iname,com, Tue 02 Sep 1997, 17:17 GMT
- Psychology, psychiatry, and other such,
coder coder#ibm,net, Tue 02 Sep 1997, 16:50 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]