Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
Re: [MUD-Dev] The morality of logfiles [was 'Wild west']
<Oh bother piglet, original reply was eaten somewheres along the line.
Here's another attempt with a bit of reformatting to avoid the conquerer
worm>
On 29 Dec 97 at 11:09, Ola Fosheim Gr°stad wrote:
>
> Humans are likely to stretch rules as far as they can according to
> their own norms... :-/ I don't see any reason why MUD admins should be
> different. Anyway, the main issue here was what kind of rules the MUD
> should have in the first place.
Well an adminstrator/implementor makes the rules and are not subject
to them. They may violate, bend, change or enforce them at their whim. If
players perceive injustice or inconsistency and can't abide it, they leave
- Thread context:
- The morality of logfiles [was 'Wild west'], (continued)
- The morality of logfiles [was 'Wild west'],
s001gmu s001gmu#nova,wright.edu, Mon 29 Dec 1997, 20:11 GMT
- Re: [MUD-Dev] The morality of logfiles [was 'Wild west'],
Jon A. Lambert jlsysinc#ix,netcom.com, Tue 30 Dec 1997, 09:18 GMT
- Re: [MUD-Dev] The morality of logfiles [was 'Wild west'],
Jon A. Lambert jlsysinc#ix,netcom.com, Tue 30 Dec 1997, 22:30 GMT
- Re: [MUD-Dev] The morality of logfiles [was 'Wild west'],
Jon A. Lambert jlsysinc#ix,netcom.com, Tue 30 Dec 1997, 09:18 GMT
- Re: [MUD-Dev] Wild west (was Guilds & Politics),
JC Lawrence claw#under,Eng.Sun.COM, Tue 30 Dec 1997, 00:59 GMT
- Re: [MUD-Dev] Wild west (was Guilds & Politics),
Felix A. Croes felix#xs1,simplex.nl, Fri 26 Dec 1997, 12:39 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]