dar at thekeep.org
Sat May 17 17:26:36 New Zealand Standard Time 1997
coder at ibm.net writes:
> >:> Umm, "its not that unsafe"? What is unsafe at all? And no, the fact that
> >:> I can efficiently implement the language isn't necessarily part of the
> >:> specification of the language, but it is certainly something that I will
> >:> be concerned about just as much as the details of the language spec.
> >:Don't worry about it too much. If Scheme can be compiled to run about
> >:as fast as C, then anything else can. :)
> >Grfff! Can you please tell me what you are saying is unsafe in my setup?
> >If there is a problem I want to fix it!
> >Perhaps it is time to take this off the mailing list?
> Please don't. I'm interested in this thread and it has a lot to do with
> the design of an internal language for a MUD server (ie is on topic).
Exactly. I'm following, and participating, in this for exactly that
reason. In fact, I think it was part of my introduction post that
triggered a large portion of it. :)
Dan Root - dar at thekeep.org
More information about the MUD-Dev