Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
[META] Mailing lists
On Tue, 7 Apr 1998, Travis S. Casey wrote:
> Well, in my admittedly limited experience, mailing lists don't tend to
> have the problems with spam and low signal-noise ratios that newsgroups
> do. Part of this is because of the differences in the kinds of people
> that newsgroups and mailing lists attract (mailing lists often attract
> those who don't want to put up with the spam and noise on newsgroups) and
> part is because it's easier to forcibly remove someone from a mailing
> list.
>
While this is true, any list on a popular topic (like muds) that can
attract people like the "Midgaard is kewl" types is going to have LOTS of
white noise if left totally open. I just cringe thinking about it because
I can quite clearly see stuff like the Mud on Win95 and how to do
(something trivial if you have a clue) to ROM posts by people. I even bet
we'd get the coder wanted crap too :P
Some kind of selection criteria is needed for who is allowed to post
unless you want a ton of meaningless stuff like the stuff we ignore in
r.g.m.a.
-Kat
- Thread context:
- Meta: who dat guy, wot dat web?, (continued)
- Meta: who dat guy, wot dat web?,
s001gmu s001gmu#nova,wright.edu, Tue 07 Apr 1998, 16:31 GMT
- Re: [MUD-Dev] Meta: who dat guy, wot dat web?,
Katrina McClelan kitkat#the486,bradley.edu, Tue 07 Apr 1998, 17:39 GMT
- Re: [MUD-Dev] Re: [Fwd: MUD-Dev],
Travis S. Casey efindel#io,com, Tue 07 Apr 1998, 17:15 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]