Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
[MUD-Dev] Re: Analysis and specification - the dirty words ofmud development?
Greg Munt <greg#uni-corn,demon.co.uk> wrote:
>I decided to give up waiting for someone to add some more to this thread
>before I responded. I note with interest (and dismay) that the number of
>posts in this thread are scarce.
>
>Is the topic just not interesting enough, do you not feel knowledgable
>enough to comment, or do you not think analysis has any part to play in a
>one-person development team? (If the last one is true, you're very, very
>wrong.*)
I for one am interested, but not at all knowledgeable about the subject;
can anyone recommend any good books on the topic, or any other form of
information?
I do have a copy of Code Complete, but it merely skims the topics...
Andrew C.M. McClintock
andrew#moonstar,com andrewm#mail,hsc.edu
- Thread context:
- [MUD-Dev] Re: Analysis and specification - the dirty words of mud development?, (continued)
- [MUD-Dev] Re: Analysis and specification - the dirty words of mud development?,
Greg Munt greg#uni-corn,demon.co.uk, Fri 12 Jun 1998, 20:42 GMT
- [MUD-Dev] Re: Analysis and specification - the dirty words of mud development?,
Holly Sommer hsommer#micro,ti.com, Fri 12 Jun 1998, 21:06 GMT
- [MUD-Dev] Re: Analysis and specification - the dirty words of mud development?,
Richard Woolcock KaVir#dial,pipex.com, Fri 12 Jun 1998, 23:15 GMT
- [MUD-Dev] Re: Analysis and specification - the dirty words ofmud development?,
Andrew C.M. McClintock andrewm#tiger,hsc.edu, Sun 14 Jun 1998, 09:32 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]