Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
Re: [MUD-Dev] Properties of computer languages
On Thu, 17 Jun 1999, Cynbe ru Taren wrote:
> In general, a conditional of some sort, and recursion, are the
> practical minimal set you're thinking of. Look at the languague which
> Scheme compiles down to after all macro expansion is done on something
> like the Guy Steele's Rabbit compiler, and you'll see more or less
> this.
Quite a few programming languages have managed without recursion, though,
by having iteration constructs -- e.g., Fortran and several BASICs.
Recursion can be fairly hard to implement, so depending on what you want
to use the language for, it might be easier to just have a GOTO statement
and/or a couple of specific iterators. (You can implement any sort of
iteration with GOTO, after all -- although if your programs are going to
be more than a page or two, they may get very hard to read.)
--
|\ _,,,---,,_ Travis S. Casey <efindel#io,com>
ZZzz /,`.-'`' -. ;-;;,_ No one agrees with me. Not even me.
|,4- ) )-,_..;\ ( `'-'
'---''(_/--' `-'\_)
_______________________________________________
MUD-Dev maillist - MUD-Dev#kanga,nu
http://www.kanga.nu/lists/listinfo/mud-dev
- Thread context:
- Re: [MUD-Dev] Properties of computer languages, (continued)
- Re: [MUD-Dev] Properties of computer languages,
Mik Clarke mikclrk#ibm,net, Fri 18 Jun 1999, 20:43 GMT
- Re: [MUD-Dev] Properties of computer languages,
David95037 David95037#aol,com, Thu 17 Jun 1999, 15:39 GMT
- [MUD-Dev] Properties of computer languages,
Cynbe ru Taren cynbe#muq,org, Thu 17 Jun 1999, 15:39 GMT
- Re: [MUD-Dev] Properties of computer languages,
Chris Gray cg#ami-cg,GraySage.Edmonton.AB.CA, Fri 18 Jun 1999, 01:40 GMT
- Re: [MUD-Dev] Properties of computer languages,
David95037 David95037#aol,com, Fri 18 Jun 1999, 14:19 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]