[MUD-Dev] Two threads forced to one CPU? (was: Collecting ideas for a MUD server...)

["Wesley W. Terpstra" <terpstra#iota,dhs.org>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Wed, 22 Dec 1999 21:54:37, Rahul Sinha <rsinha#glue,umd.edu> wrote:
> hear hear! keep in mind, multiple threads ought not seperate themselves on
> seperate cpus due to cache coherency issues (depends on your OS if they
> do) and either way, the only reason to have threads is to eliminate wait
> for blocking operations.

What?! You're saying if I spawn two threads and having both work nonstop
the OS won't put them on different CPUs?

I thought this was the whole point to multi-threading?
Please explain.

- ---
E-mail: terpstra#interchange,ubc.ca        Host: iota.dhs.org
PGP key: hkp://wwwkeys.us.pgp.net/terpstra#interchange,ubc.ca
         http://www.iota.dhs.org/pgp-keys/terpstra.pgp

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGPfreeware 5.0i for non-commercial use
Comment: Made with pgp4pine 1.71b
Charset: noconv

iQA/AwUBOGHuH6Yi3MeZ5h2mEQJp6gCg+KKWJYHUJQOjG4xzQf4FbuZWMRAAoI+q
+R5yt/P1rR4JJL22kRWyQM6a
=pfEm
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----




_______________________________________________
MUD-Dev maillist  -  MUD-Dev#kanga,nu
http://www.kanga.nu/lists/listinfo/mud-dev