[MUD-Dev] code base inquiry
greear at cyberhighway.net
Wed Nov 17 23:08:21 New Zealand Daylight Time 1999
"Matthew D. Fuller" wrote:
> I think if we're talking about codebases that can be used commercially as
> well as 'freely', the GPL becomes a problem itself. Requiring source
> disclosure of all your changes is a burden if you're trying to use those
> changes (new features! new things to do! new fun stuff!) to distinguish
> yourself from 'the rest' and attract people to make a buck.
If you don't distribute the code in binary form, then you don't have to
release the source either. Operating a server does not count as
releasing a binary, so you are under no legal burden to release the
source. This may not go over well with people, but the GPL allows it.
> BSD-style licensing!
I think that tends to lead towards more forking, and seems to have less
mindshare on the internet today. That said, I really like being able to
use BSD licensed code at work, and I think it is definately the way to
go for libraries, stacks, and other things that are the nuts and bolts
we build with..
Ben Greear (greear at cyberhighway.net) http://scry.wanfear.com/~greear
Author of ScryMUD: scry.wanfear.com 4444 (Released under GPL)
MUD-Dev maillist - MUD-Dev at kanga.nu
More information about the MUD-Dev