[MUD-Dev] Proper liscense for MUD source? Perhaps not GPL... (fwd)
J C Lawrence
claw at cp.net
Wed Dec 22 15:22:52 New Zealand Daylight Time 1999
On Tue, 21 Dec 1999 16:07:48 -0500 (EST)
Rahul Sinha <rsinha at glue.umd.edu> wrote:
> On Tue, 21 Dec 1999, J C Lawrence wrote:
>> On Tue, 21 Dec 1999 00:17:55 -0500 (EST) Rahul Sinha
>> <rsinha at glue.umd.edu> wrote:
> (we are assuming being OSD-compliant is not an issue, I am pretty
> sure that the OSD is totally incompatible with the aim of the
> original license that we are discussing)
The expressed intent it violates OSD for sections #5, #6, and
BTW: Please lose the e. e. cummings bit.
>> Agreed, which was part of my point on my source being mine and
>> therefore the choice of license being mine.
> but while your modifications are yours, they are also derivative
> Its like patents. If your patent extends someone elses, or relies
> on tech that is in someone else's, even though this patent has
> been awarded to you, every time you want to license the tech out,
> you have to get permission from your predecessor. (OTOH no one
> else can license your code out w/o your permission)
With the exception that this case enforces a license on me in the
normal use of my code.
J C Lawrence Internet: claw at kanga.nu
----------(*) Internet: coder at kanga.nu
...Honorary Member of Clan McFud -- Teamer's Avenging Monolith...
MUD-Dev maillist - MUD-Dev at kanga.nu
More information about the MUD-Dev