Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
RE: [MUD-Dev] RE:Troublemakers and their M.O.
On Thu, 30 Mar 2000, Sellers, Michael wrote:
> > Ok so nusiance didn't work and we are back to ban,
>
> Why didn't it work? Was it ineffective or did the nuisance players find
> ways around it?
>
What I meant by that is there are some people nuisance just won't work for
and for those people you have to use ban. I have found nuisance a very
effective form of punishment, and we have been using it over a year now.
Kevin London
_______________________________________________
MUD-Dev mailing list
MUD-Dev#kanga,nu
http://www.kanga.nu/lists/listinfo/mud-dev
- Thread context:
- [MUD-Dev] RE:Troublemakers and their M.O.,
Aaron Leslie silrathi#yahoo,com, Thu 30 Mar 2000, 04:00 GMT
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- RE: [MUD-Dev] RE:Troublemakers and their M.O.,
Sellers, Michael MSellers#maxis,com, Thu 30 Mar 2000, 19:24 GMT
- Re: [MUD-Dev] RE:Troublemakers and their M.O.,
Chris Jacobson fear#technologist,com, Thu 30 Mar 2000, 19:24 GMT
- Re: [MUD-Dev] RE:Troublemakers and their M.O.,
Lovecraft dave#darkages,com, Fri 31 Mar 2000, 01:02 GMT
- [MUD-Dev] Meta: Questions about the MudDev FAQ,
Jon A. Lambert jlsysinc#ix,netcom.com, Tue 28 Mar 2000, 01:06 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]