Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
Re[2]: [MUD-Dev] Justifying twinking
On Friday, April 28, 2000, adam#treyarch,com wrote:
> On Fri, 28 Apr 2000, J C Lawrence wrote:
>> > Travis S. Casey wrote:
>> >> To me, it seems ridiculous -- no real squirrel or rat is likely
>> >> to inflict significant harm on a normal, healthy, awake & aware
>> >> adult human even *without* armor and weapons.
>>
>> Anybody who has bathed a cat knows how effective a small, fluffy
>> cuddly big-eyed pettable small animal can be in its own defense.
>> Anybody that has walked too near a nesting goose will also know just
>> how fearsome an opponent a gander can make (a critter whose only
>> "real" weapon is a rather dull beak).
> Yes, but in all of these examples (including Christopher's coon and
> posum stories), your goal was not to *kill* the creature, but rather
> to do something with it (take it somewhere, or wash behind its ears, or
> whatever).
> My guess is that any full-grown adult who put on a full suit of "armor"
> (body padding and maybe a catcher's mask), grabbed a baseball bat, then
> went out and found any small mamal with the purpose of pummeling it
> to death would probably not have the slightest chance of taking more than
> scratches from the creature before it was unconscious.
> Now, actually getting one to sit still long enough for you to smack it with
> the bat is another matter altogether.
Yep -- small and fast == very hard to hit. You'll note that I never
said that they're easy to kill, just that they're not likely to
seriously hurt a human. That's why people hunting small animals use
ranged weapons -- trying to kill one with a sword or club is going to
take way more running around chasing it than it's worth.
> Another argument for not putting these sorts of "newbie targets" into a mud
> is obvious looking at this example:
> Pummeling small furry animals does not a hero make.
Definitely. Of course, that only matters if your players want to be
heroes, but many of them do.
It just feels ridiculous. Who fantasizes about being a rat-catcher or
squirrel-hunter? Well, probably someone does, but not many people do.
--
|\ _,,,---,,_ Travis S. Casey <efindel#io,com>
ZZzz /,`.-'`' -. ;-;;,_ No one agrees with me. Not even me.
|,4- ) )-,_..;\ ( `'-'
'---''(_/--' `-'\_)
_______________________________________________
MUD-Dev mailing list
MUD-Dev#kanga,nu
http://www.kanga.nu/lists/listinfo/mud-dev
- Thread context:
- Re: [MUD-Dev] Justifying twinking, (continued)
- Re: [MUD-Dev] Justifying twinking,
Caliban Tiresias Darklock caliban#darklock,com, Fri 28 Apr 2000, 20:53 GMT
- RE: [MUD-Dev] Justifying twinking,
Christopher Allen ChristopherA#Skotos,net, Fri 28 Apr 2000, 23:24 GMT
- Re: [MUD-Dev] Justifying twinking,
J C Lawrence claw#cp,net, Fri 28 Apr 2000, 23:52 GMT
- Re: [MUD-Dev] Justifying twinking,
adam adam#treyarch,com, Sat 29 Apr 2000, 01:03 GMT
- Re[2]: [MUD-Dev] Justifying twinking,
Travis Casey efindel#io,com, Sat 29 Apr 2000, 01:46 GMT
- RE: [MUD-Dev] Justifying twinking,
Christopher Allen ChristopherA#Skotos,net, Sat 29 Apr 2000, 03:20 GMT
- Re[2]: [MUD-Dev] Justifying twinking,
Travis Casey efindel#io,com, Sat 29 Apr 2000, 00:12 GMT
- RE: [MUD-Dev] Justifying twinking,
John Bertoglio jb#pulsepoll,com, Sat 29 Apr 2000, 01:46 GMT
- RE: [MUD-Dev] Justifying twinking,
Christopher Allen ChristopherA#Skotos,net, Sat 29 Apr 2000, 03:20 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]