Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
Re: [MUD-Dev] Re: [Meta] New poll
Eli Stevens wrote:
> > I am not sure, but I do not think that any one of the answers
> > addresses MUDs like Achaea. Might there be room for a "Yes, it
> > was supported by the business model"?
>
JC replied:
> I wanted to phrase the poll from the vantage of a player not a game
> operator, mostly because I think its something that is outside of
> the game operator's hands.
I am a player in Achaea and I would have answered "Yes, it was supported by
the business model."
In other words I only buy stuff when I know it's not giving me an unfair
advantage, ie one that the game designers didn't intend.
~Tess
_______________________________________________
MUD-Dev mailing list
MUD-Dev#kanga,nu
http://www.kanga.nu/lists/listinfo/mud-dev
- Thread context:
- [MUD-Dev] Re: [Meta] New poll, (continued)
- [MUD-Dev] Re: [Meta] New poll,
J C Lawrence claw#kanga,nu, Sat 10 Jun 2000, 06:56 GMT
- [MUD-Dev] Little Touches (was Bay Area Press re: UO, the good the bad and the Ugly),
Todd McKimmey rufus#wombatgames,com, Sat 10 Jun 2000, 17:58 GMT
- Re: [MUD-Dev] Re: [Meta] New poll,
Eli Stevens wickedgrey#wickedgrey,com, Sat 10 Jun 2000, 18:52 GMT
- Re: [MUD-Dev] Re: [Meta] New poll,
J C Lawrence claw#kanga,nu, Sat 10 Jun 2000, 19:12 GMT
- Re: [MUD-Dev] Re: [Meta] New poll,
Tess Lowe tess#havensong,com, Sat 10 Jun 2000, 20:46 GMT
- Re: [MUD-Dev] Re: [Meta] New poll,
PLAGNAL XAVIER the_druid#cybercable,fr, Sun 11 Jun 2000, 00:58 GMT
- Re: [MUD-Dev] Re: [Meta] New poll,
Matthew Mihaly the_logos#achaea,com, Sun 11 Jun 2000, 00:58 GMT
- Re: [MUD-Dev] Re: [Meta] New poll,
Matthew Mihaly the_logos#achaea,com, Sun 11 Jun 2000, 00:58 GMT
- Re: [MUD-Dev] Re: [Meta] New poll,
Wes Connell wconnell#skotos,net, Sun 11 Jun 2000, 01:00 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]