[MUD-Dev] Object and class heirarchies -- are they really necessary?
philen at funky.monkey.org
Wed Mar 22 01:01:33 New Zealand Daylight Time 2000
On Tue, Mar 21, 2000 at 03:57:25PM -0800, J C Lawrence wrote:
> True. That was one of the sources of the design requirement for
> Murkle that features must be programmable without requiring source
> access to any other objects.
No matter how many times I read this design requirement--and it has been
many: I have read and reread nearly every thread in the archive in which
it appears--I always come to the conclusion that it is either tautological
or trivially false. Since both those conclusions seem unlikely candidates
for what you mean, I was wondering if you could clarify.
I read your design requirement either as:
"Any object must be able to affect any other object without
changing that other object."
which is obviously my trivially false reading :) Or I read it as:
"Any object must be able to affect itself without changing
any other object."
which is my tautological reading.
MUD-Dev mailing list
MUD-Dev at kanga.nu
More information about the MUD-Dev