Advanced Topic - Doing it differently.
polpak at yahoo.com
Fri Apr 8 06:40:41 New Zealand Standard Time 2005
--- Hiddukel <hiddukel at rebeldev.net> wrote:
> If you are trying to prove that D can do some things that C can't you don't
> need to, after all D is basically an extension of C and C++ so naturally it
> is going to extend the possibilities. If it didn't then there would be
> absolutely no use for it. I would like to see you write D code for dynamic
> class loading however, because even the D documentation admits that it can't
> do this but C# and Java can.
Yeah, you can dynamically load classes in C++ too, so long as the interface the
class uses is compiled into the non-dynamic code.
-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
GCS/L/C/O d-(+) s++: a-- C+++$>++++ UBLS++++$
P+++(--)$ L+++>++++ E--- W+>++$ N !o K? w(--) !O
M- !V PS+ PE(++) Y+ PGP->+ t+ 5 X+() R(+) tv+@
b++(+++) !DI+++ D G(-) e>+++$ h---() r+++ y+++
------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------
Show us what our next emoticon should look like. Join the fun.
ROM mailing list
ROM at rom.org
Unsubscribe here ->>> http://www.rom.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rom
More information about the MUD-Dev